It’s dead, we’re just waiting for the music to stop playing. Perhaps that’s why Musk was allowed to buy Twitter – it was being offloaded anyway. Remember austerity? Real austerity has happened and nobody noticed.Īnyway, they’re all scrambling to try to retain revenue. Seems the ncov budget crisis has made the government cut its youtube/twitter/facebook/reddit subsidies. It could in theory ban newspapers, and this would result in genuine persecution of journalists (very glorious) but precisely because it’s glorious, the black government will never do so under any circumstances. Pretend to fight ignobility as a means of spreading impiety and getting away with it.Ī black government cannot be used for good. There are individuals too stupid to recognize this, but they’re also too stupid to tie their own shoes. The argument: if you outlaw everything inglorious, humans will be forced to be glorious. They want the high-octane super-addictive stuff instead. In the case of Twitter, addicts “regret” taking the low-rent cut-with-flour version of Twitter. The addict doesn’t enjoy their substance, but they will only tell you they don’t “regret” abusing it after they pass through withdrawal. Consequently, he doesn’t know what subsidized speech is, and can easily be tricked into being a censor.įun bonus fact: Musk also doesn’t know how regret works. It then dies of having all its feathers fouled. You approve the ‘rescue’ of this ‘dove’ and put it through the pipeline. Your people keep dunking a pigeon in white paint and handing them to you. Imagine doves were endangered and you wanted to save them. Musk doesn’t know what subsidized speech is. As in physically stand behind them looking over their shoulder, until you’ve counter-indoctrinated them. You really do have to micromanage these people to prevent this sort of thing. There’s still many volunteer witch-hunters tirelessly manipulating procedural outcomes. Let’s see how this works out for him.ĭespite firing 90% or whatever, Musk didn’t get all the DNC moles. Anglin’s strategy for convincing Musk is to: whine. Musk doesn’t want to pay for Anglin’s speech. Naturally, as a subsidy, it is irresponsible.Īnglin wants Musk to pay for his speech. The spade-a-spade term is subsidized speech. Speech is property and someone has to pay for it, just like everything else. I think me and Nick and Kanye should all be allowed on Twitter, and I think we should all be given long-form interviews with Tucker Carlson.īut everyone sees what’s happening here: there is one thing you are never, ever allowed to talk about.įree speech is a myth. Honestly, I think both things should be fine. Admitting to wire fraud on a podcast and being on tape telling a bitch you’re not sorry for choking her during sex is fine. So, do the math: saying “Jew” in a relatively controlled and normal way gets you kicked off the island. Tucker actually persecuted Nick Fuentes, claiming that he was “filling Kanye’s head,” even though Kanye was on record saying all this stuff about Jews before he ever knew who Nick was.Īfter ditching Kanye – Tucker literally canceled a documentary with him – he becomes obsessed with Tate as the new hero for the blacks (even though Tate is basically white-presenting and not even American – you’ve never met a single American black who acts like Andrew Tate, and there is no way normal blacks identify with him like they do with Kanye). Then, Kanye West said that Jews sometimes do bad things. Here’s the thing about that: he was originally trying to do this with Kanye West. But I’m just saying: Tucker Carlson is trying to make this guy into the cutting edge of black conservatism. I am not going to attack Andrew Tate when he’s the victim of politically motivated prosecution.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |